Tuesday, October 22, 2019
Press and Politics essays
Press and Politics essays Attitudes of different press to the withdrawal of the anti-subversion bill In this project, we are going to look into different attitudes of a number of newspapers in HK to the controversy issue C withdrawal of the anti-subversion bill, which sparked massive street protests and triggered the territory's worst political crisis since 1997. To make it clearer, it is a postponement of the legislation procedure of the national security bill only, but not a cancellation of the Article 23. First, we can take a look on the editorial of MingPao (see reference article no.1) on 2003-09-06. Actually, we can see the general attitude of newspapers in Hong Kong hold attitudes more or less similar.  ¡Ã‚ °Ã‚ ¡Ã‚ ÎÒƒÙ" ³Ãƒâ€°   ¡Ãƒ ¹Ã‚ ¾Ã‚ ¡23-l ¡Ã‚  ¡  ¡Ã‚ °Ã‚ ¡Ã‚ We support the legislation of the Article 23 in the Basic Law  ¡Ã‚  ¡ MingPao support the legislation, but more consultation and consideration is needed before the implementation.  ¡Ã‚ °Ã‚ ¡Ã‚  ³ÃƒËœÃ¢â‚¬ ¡Ãƒ ¸Ã‚ °Ã‚ ²Ã‚ ²Ãƒ  °Ã‚ ¸Ã‚ ¡Ã‚ ÊÇÃÆ'à ·Ãƒâ€"Ç µÃƒâ€žÃƒ »Ãƒ Ç °Ã‚ ¸Ãƒâ€ºÃƒË†Ãƒâ€¹Ã‚ µÃƒâ€žÃƒâ€™iÃ…  ¡Ã‚ ¡  ¡Ã‚ °Ã‚ ¡Ã‚ the withdrawal of the national security bill  ¡Ã‚ is wise, it meets the will of Hong Kong People ¡ So, the postponement of the bill is welcomed, and they generally think it can do goods to the economy.  ¡Ã‚ °Ã‚ ¡Ã‚ ÎÒƒÕJÃ… ¾ÃƒÅ'Ø...^Õà ¾Ã‚ ¸ÃƒË†Ã‚ ²Ãƒâ€°iÇà Ê ¡23-lß^ ³ÃƒÅ'Ëà ¹Ã‚ ¸Ã‚ µÃƒâ€žeÕ` Ø µÃƒâ€" ¸Ãƒâ€žÃƒâ€"ƒÆÆÇÓÑ ¼Ã‚ ³Ã‚ ¡ ÄÒÃÆ' µÃƒâ€žÃƒâ€"à ·iLi ËÆ µÃƒâ€žÃƒâ€¢Ãƒ ¾Ãƒâ€"ÃŽÅ ¾Ãƒâ€žyßà ¾^m ³F ¡  ¡Ã‚ °Ã‚ ¡Ã‚ if the government does not change its working style of  ¡listening to the supporters voice only ¡Ã‚ ¯,  ¡making everyone either frie...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.